FCSNW2018 English header

Metro Toronto Convention Centre 
255 Front St West, North Building, Toronto Ontario 
June 13-15, 2018 

Bats in Belfries: Considering SARA-listed Bats on Federal Lands
Chris Albrecht, SNC-Lavalin Inc.
The objective of this presentation is to demonstrate effective planning and management for the remediation of federal sites when species at risk are identified.

When contaminated sites occur on federal lands, those planning remediation activities must consider the potential for the presence of species at risk listed under the federal Species at Risk Act (SARA). In 2014, the little brown myotis (Myotis lucifugus) and two other bat species were listed as endangered under SARA due to catastrophic declines in eastern North America caused by the fungal infection known as White-nose Syndrome. The little brown myotis is widely distributed across Canada and is protected by SARA across its full range. The species is known to inhabit a variety of anthropogenic infrastructure that may be subject to remediation activities including industrial facilities, mines and heritage buildings.

SARA prohibits the death of individuals, destruction or disturbance of a “residence”, or rendering a residence non-functional. Destruction of critical habitat (currently defined in the draft recovery strategy as winter hibernacula; caves and mines) is also prohibited. A SARA permit is required to authorize disturbance or destruction of critical habitat or a residence on federal land.

A final recovery strategy that includes the species-specific definition of a “residence” and identification of critical habitat has not yet been released, but it is likely that maternity roosts in anthropogenic structures would be considered “residences” and thus protected. Planning for contaminated sites projects on federal land must include consideration of the potential risk of contravening SARA at sites that may have little brown myotis present.

This presentation will provide an overview of the current state of legal protection and management for little brown myotis under SARA; review the general ecology of little brown myotis, focusing on areas where remediation activities could present a potential overlap with the species’ presence; and, identify ways to assess and manage the risk of a remediation project contravening SARA, ensuring appropriate due diligence to avoid harm to the species and individuals. An example project involving the planning for demolition and remediation of an industrial sawmill complex on federal land will provide context for the discussion.

The Challenges of Conducting a Traditional Dig and Dump Remediation Excavation in a Sensitive Site Setting – Columbia National Wildlife Area
Kate Lindfield1 and Steve Custeau2
1SLR Consulting (Canada) Ltd.
2Matcon Environmental Ltd.
The objective of this presentation is to demonstrate that, with the right approach and the correct equipment, excavation and disposal is a viable remediation option in ecologically sensitive areas.

The Columbia National Wildlife Area (NWA) is located in the Southern Rocky Mountain Trench of British Columbia, near the towns of Invermere and Radium, and comprises a series of wetlands adjoining the headwaters of the Columbia River. The four units of the NWA have been managed by the Canadian Wildlife Service since the 1970s and provide an important breeding and resting habitat for migrating birds as they travel along the Pacific Flyway. The NWA also provides an important habitat for non-migratory wildlife, including several species at risk. The project site is located within the Wilmer Marsh Unit of the Columbia NWA and comprises a bench-land of fine-grained glaciolacustrine sediments, which slopes steeply down to the marshlands of the meandering Columbia River, located 60 m below.

The subject site was used as an unofficial refuse dump for several decades. Several environmental assessments and remediation phases conducted between 2002 and present have revealed extensive refuse depositions comprising automobiles, construction materials, metal debris and general household refuse. Waste materials had been dumped within the marsh, cast down the face of the slopes, and had been buried in the upland area of the site. Car bodies had also been used as the foundations of a trail built to access the marsh from the bench. Contaminants of concern comprising metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and petroleum hydrocarbons were encountered in the soil, sediment and surface water associated with the debris.

Various debris and soil removal programs have been completed between 1997 and 2017, removing over 9,000 tonnes of debris and associated contaminated soil. The location of this debris and contaminated soil in sensitive ecological habitat, combined with steep, unstable slopes and geotechnically sensitive soils made the execution of remediation programs technically and logistically challenging.

This presentation will outline the methods used during the 2016/2017 remediation phase and the challenges faced when using heavy machinery to conduct a traditional dig and dump excavation program in an environmentally sensitive area. The presentation will outline the importance of bringing together a team of specialists, comprising an earthworks contractor utilizing specialist earthworks equipment, biologists, geotechnical specialists, contaminated sites specialists and the responsible regulatory agencies, to ensure that the objective of safely removing as much debris as possible from the slopes was met; whilst also limiting disturbance of the sensitive environment, and restoring the site to a state that approached pre-dumpsite conditions. However, it was not possible to remove all debris during the 2016/2017 remediation program, therefore this presentation also outlines the techniques subsequently utilized to deal with the debris that was left in place.

Questions en

fb icon   Twitter icon   linkedIn icon